At FalconBlockchain, we are committed to developing and deploying artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in an ethical, responsible, and compliant manner. This framework outlines our principles, practices, and compliance measures for AI systems.
2025 AI Regulation Compliance
This framework has been updated to comply with the 2025 AI Act, the Global AI Governance Framework, and other regional AI regulations. We've implemented comprehensive risk assessment procedures, enhanced transparency measures, and expanded human oversight mechanisms in accordance with these regulations.
1. Our AI Ethical Principles
Our AI development and deployment are guided by the following core principles:
- Human-Centered Design: We design AI systems that augment human capabilities and respect human autonomy, rather than replacing or diminishing human agency.
- Fairness and Non-Discrimination: We strive to develop AI systems that are fair and do not create or reinforce bias or discrimination against individuals or groups.
- Transparency and Explainability: We commit to making our AI systems as transparent as possible and providing explanations for AI-driven decisions that affect users.
- Privacy and Security: We implement robust data protection measures and respect user privacy in all AI applications.
- Accountability: We take responsibility for our AI systems and their impacts, maintaining appropriate human oversight and governance structures.
- Safety and Reliability: We design AI systems to be safe, reliable, and to perform as intended, with appropriate fallback mechanisms in case of failure.
- Societal and Environmental Well-being: We consider the broader societal and environmental impacts of our AI systems and strive for positive contributions.
2. AI Risk Classification
In accordance with the 2025 AI Act, we classify our AI systems based on their potential risk level:
Risk Level | Description | Examples | Compliance Measures |
---|
Unacceptable Risk | AI systems that pose a clear threat to safety, livelihoods, or rights | Social scoring, manipulation of behavior | We do not develop or deploy AI systems in this category |
High Risk | AI systems that could significantly impact health, safety, fundamental rights, or access to essential services | Critical infrastructure management, employment decision systems, credit scoring | Rigorous risk assessment, human oversight, extensive documentation, regular auditing |
Limited Risk | AI systems with specific transparency obligations due to their interaction with humans | Chatbots, emotion recognition, content recommendation | Clear disclosure of AI nature, transparency about capabilities and limitations |
Minimal Risk | AI systems that pose minimal risk to rights or safety | AI-enabled video games, spam filters, inventory management systems | Voluntary application of our AI ethics principles and code of conduct |
3. AI Governance Structure
We have established a robust governance structure to ensure ethical AI development and compliance:
- AI Ethics Committee: An interdisciplinary committee that reviews AI projects, provides ethical guidance, and ensures compliance with our principles and applicable regulations.
- AI Compliance Officer: A designated officer responsible for monitoring regulatory developments, implementing compliance measures, and coordinating with regulatory authorities.
- AI Risk Assessment Team: A specialized team that conducts risk assessments for AI systems and develops mitigation strategies.
- Regular External Audits: Independent third-party audits of our high-risk AI systems to verify compliance and identify areas for improvement.
4. Transparency and Documentation
For each AI system we develop or deploy, we maintain comprehensive documentation including:
- System architecture and design specifications
- Data sources, collection methods, and preprocessing procedures
- Training methodologies and validation processes
- Performance metrics and evaluation results
- Risk assessments and mitigation strategies
- Human oversight mechanisms
- Intended use cases and limitations
For high-risk AI systems, we provide additional documentation as required by the 2025 AI Act, including detailed technical documentation and user instructions.
5. Data Governance
We implement strict data governance practices for AI development and deployment:
- Data Quality: We ensure that training data is relevant, representative, and of sufficient quality.
- Data Minimization: We collect and use only the data necessary for the intended purpose.
- Bias Detection and Mitigation: We actively identify and address potential biases in training data.
- Data Security: We implement robust security measures to protect data used in AI systems.
- Data Rights: We respect data subject rights and obtain appropriate consent for data use.
6. Human Oversight
We maintain appropriate human oversight for all AI systems, with enhanced measures for high-risk systems:
- Clear allocation of oversight responsibilities to qualified personnel
- Ability for human overseers to fully understand the AI system's capabilities and limitations
- Mechanisms to detect anomalies or problems and activate fallback procedures when necessary
- Authority to override AI decisions when appropriate
- Regular training for personnel involved in human oversight
7. Regulatory Compliance
We comply with all applicable AI regulations, including but not limited to:
- The 2025 AI Act (European Union)
- The Global AI Governance Framework
- The U.S. AI Bill of Rights and related federal and state regulations
- Industry-specific AI regulations in sectors where we operate
- Regional and national AI regulations in all jurisdictions where our products are available
Our AI Compliance Officer continuously monitors regulatory developments and updates our compliance measures accordingly.
8. Incident Response
We have established procedures for responding to AI incidents, including:
- Prompt identification and assessment of incidents
- Immediate mitigation measures to prevent harm
- Notification to affected individuals and relevant authorities as required
- Root cause analysis and implementation of corrective actions
- Documentation and reporting of incidents
9. Continuous Improvement
We are committed to continuously improving our AI ethics and compliance framework through:
- Regular reviews and updates of our policies and procedures
- Ongoing monitoring of AI system performance and impacts
- Incorporation of feedback from users, stakeholders, and experts
- Investment in research and development of more ethical and responsible AI technologies
- Participation in industry initiatives and standards development
10. Contact Information
For questions or concerns about our AI ethics and compliance practices, please contact our AI Ethics Office at ai-ethics@falconblockchain.com.